Magnitude 5.2 earthquake strikes 66 km off Manay

MANILA – On the morning of Sunday, October 19, 2025, at approximately 03:34 Philippine time, a magnitude 5.2 seismic event occurred beneath the sea some 66 kilometres off the town of Manay on the eastern coast of Mindanao. The event was recorded by monitoring agencies and was located within a region also including the municipalities of Tarragona (70 km away, population ~27,349), Caraga (71 km, ~39,630 residents), Lukatan (73 km, ~2,557 residents) and Baculin (78 km, ~2,971 residents).

Though the magnitude places this quake at a moderate level by Philippine standards, several critical parameters remain undetermined and underline the limitations of the early assessment. The rupture depth — a key factor in estimating ground-shaking intensity and secondary effects — was not available in the initial report. Without that figure, the potential for strong surface shaking or subsea displacement is harder to quantify.

Moreover, the only reported measure of shaking in the immediate area is the maximum experienced intensity, recorded at 4.2 on the intensity scale referenced (analogous to the Richter-scale orientation). No instrument-estimated intensity is yet publicly available. Because the number of seismic stations used to locate the event was described as relatively low, and because the spacing of those stations was relatively wide, seismologists caution that the horizontal epicentre position and related parameters should be considered tentative at this stage.

This episode occurs amid heightened seismic awareness in the Philippines. Recent weeks have seen strong offshore quakes in the same general region, including a magnitude 7-plus event off Davao Oriental on October 10, which triggered tsunami warnings and caused fatalities. (See e.g., reports from the Associated Press and Reuters.) Domestic authorities such as the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS) continue to monitor for after-shocks and displacement hazards.

Local disaster-response agencies emphasize the importance of verifying whether infrastructure in nearby coastal towns has sustained damage. Because the magnitude of the current event was modest compared to recent large quakes, immediate large-scale damage appears unlikely, but the uncertainty around depth and precise location means that residual risk remains. Evacuation of coastal zones and review of early-warning systems remain prudent where shaking was felt.

In summary: While not among the largest events in the region this month, the Sunday quake underscores the Philippines’ ongoing vulnerability to under-sea seismic activity. The absence of precise depth data and limited station coverage leave the assessment provisional. Ongoing monitoring, further waveform analysis and local field surveys will be needed to clarify the full impact and implications of the event for coastal communities. (zai)